ITtoolkit Article Collection


Starting Strategies for Controlling Known Project Risk


Read more in the full article below.

The risk management process begins with identification - to assess a project for potential risks that could threaten the project process itself, or the outcome. But identification is only the beginning.

Once probable risks are identified, they must then be assessed to determine the level of impact - i.e. will there be a negative impact, and how serious will it be?If the impact is serious, that raises another question - i.e. is the negative impact sufficiently serious as to warrant further action? If the answer is yes, management steps must be initiated for appropriate risk control.

Getting Started: How Much Risk Is There?

Your first step in the risk control process is to determine the need. At this point, you may have taken steps to acknowledge the potential impact of risks, but awareness may not be enough. While you may choose to accept one or more types of risks, you may not be willing, or able, to withstand others. And, considering the time, effort and potential cost of risk control strategies, any such effort should be expended wisely.

Based on an analysis of probable risks, you may decide that you can withstand additional project expenses, but not schedule delays. As a result, you can focus your mitigation and control efforts onto timing risks, knowing that you could absorb certain increases in expenditures. Or, if your project schedule is aggressive, with limited time for risk analysis and control, you may decide to deal only with the most serious types of risks, taking your chances with others.

After completion of the risk "evaluation" process, you will be prepared to tackle the next step ... the formation of specific strategies for risk management and control. These strategies can include acceptance, avoidance or mitigation.

Option 1: Acting to Accept the Risk

To acknowledge the risk, but decide that any actions to avoid or mitigate the risk can be too costly or time consuming. Or, it may just be possible that the risk cannot be avoided or mitigated in any meaningful way, and the benefits of the project far outweigh the risks.

Option 2: Acting to Avoid the Risk

To take action that will eliminate the risk in entirety. Depending upon the circumstances, you may need to change project scope, modify project plans, hire additional resources, or adopt different technical solutions. Avoidance can be costly, but it may be the only way to achieve project deliverables.

Option 3: Acting to Mitigate the Risk

To take action that will minimize the potential impact of any given risk through the analysis and consideration of alternative solutions. In essence, this is a combination of acceptance and avoidance. You can alter plans and schedules, and take specific actions to minimize the chance that a risk will occur. And, you can also develop alternate plans to be enacted should the risk actually occur .... "i.e. if this happens, I will do that, but until then, I will stick with the original plan". In other words, you can be prepared in either event. While mitigating strategies provide the best of both worlds, that benefit cannot be realized without some expense in terms of time, equipment and staff resources.

Choosing "Control" Options and Taking Action

Every process needs a starting point, and when options are viewed in a structured manner, decision making is made easier and more readily justifiable.  Whether you choose to accept, avoid or mitigate a given risk will vary based on specific needs, issues and circumstances.

“Risk control” is a critical juncture in the risk management process. Every effort to control and mitigate risk has a price - in terms of time, money or resources. Before any action is taken to accept, avoid, or mitigate, these costs must be carefully considered. Risk control strategies must be carefully aligned with project needs, value and overall priority. Furthermore, risk control strategies must consider the impact that the risk could have on the project to ensure that control efforts are well placed.

Continue reading about project risks and related issues:

About Us - ITtoolkit.com has been around since 2001. We started with a few articles about IT projects, and since then have developed our own series of time-saving practices and Toolkits for managing projects and IT services. The article above is part of of our full catalog of "how-to" articles, filled with these techniques (which you won't find elsewhere) to help you get better results in less time.  We cover all the basics and then some - including projects, IT services, team building, disaster recovery and more. You can continue with our recommendations above, browse the articles catalog, or download free templates and whitepapers.  And, visit our home page to learn all that our Service Strategy and Fast Track Project Toolkits can do for you!

Subscribe to the ITtoolkit newsletter for the latest articles and updates.

The Value of a Vision!

When it comes to managing IT, having a strategic vision can make all the difference.  And that's what you will find in the pages of the Service Strategy Toolkit, from ITtoolkit.com - a fast, easy way to make a difference!

The Top 10 Uses for a Strategic IT Vision

The Service Strategy Toolkit is the ultimate "how-to" guide, showing you how to make your IT department more productive, relevant, responsive and accepted through the use of a customized "strategic vision".

Make Projects Possible!

Project success isn't easy... but it's always possible. All you need is a quick way to minimize obstacles and maximize capabilities. And that's what you'll find in our Fast Track Project Toolkit.

The Top 10 Uses for Project Fast Tracking

The Fast Track Project Toolkit is the ultimate how-to guide for strategic fast tracking, giving you the "tools" you need to manage projects in the "real world", when time is short, funding is limited, and resources are stretched thin.  It's a unique resource that belongs in every project management "bag of tricks".  Don't miss out.